Res Zürcher, a loyal Migros customer, has trouble comprehending the figure, Bilanz
says. 67 million Swiss francs? That's how much the newspaper says Migros, traditionally
Switzerland's leading retailer, plans to spend during 2005 on its corporate redesign.
"What's the point?", he asks in a letter to his local newspaper. "I simply
can't understand why they are investing so much money when you can hardly see the
difference".
When Migros decides to change its looks, the matter
resounds far beyond the four walls of the company boardroom, Bilanz says. That's because
the chain founded by Gottlieb Duttweiler has grown into a Swiss institution, and that
includes its image. Migros is not just a power brand, Bilanz says, it is a piece of Swiss
culture, a mirror of the country's society, employing over 80,000 staff - fully 2.5% of
the Swiss workforce. 72% of households use a Migros store at least once a week, more than
rivals Coop and Denner combined.
Coop is a perfect example of how difficult it is to
shape up against Migros. In an attempt to do so, in 2001, the company completely
overhauled its image, including the introduction of a new logo and new clothing for its
employees, in an exercise which received much praise among professionals. Like Martin
Hotz, of the marketing agency Fuhrer & Hotz, who tells Bilanz: "This brand
relaunch, in such a short space of time, has few equals." Yet still
the company trails.
At least Coop management can rest easy in having
brought order to its branding policy. At Migros, on the other hand, a profusion of own
labels abounds, most of them based on the letter 'M', but with little logic and lots of
confusion, Bilanz says. Despite this, the retailer seems to have lost none of its power of
attraction in the eyes of shoppers. Indeed, if one is to believe the results of the latest
edition of ad agency Young & Rubicam's Brand Asset Valuator study, as yet unpublished,
the gap between Migros and Coop has grown even wider.
Based on personal interviews with more than 1,500
consumers, the study, Bilanz says, offers a detailed insight into the soul of both brands.
Coop, it seems, scores relatively high on criteria such as 'fashionable' and 'high
quality', yet Migros scores better overall, enjoying the endorsement of consumers in terms
of qualities such as 'authentic', 'brave', 'energetic', 'dynamic' and 'social' And while
Migros' appeals to all levels of society and across the nation, Coop scores better among
young males than among women and older shoppers.
The study appears to show that content counts for
more than exterior appearance, Bilanz says. Migros may have a somewhat 'awkward' image,
but consumers still shop there happily, interpreting that awkwardness as unaffected
authenticity. In addition, one has to take into account that a slick image can awaken
expectations which risk being unfulfilled by the actual experience of shopping, says
Bilanz.
Coop spokesman Felix Wehrle, on the other hand,
disputes that his company's brand image may have suffered. "Our representative
surveys show that the value of the Coop brand has risen substantially", he tells
Bilanz, citing additional criteria such as 'freshness' and 'dynamism' although not giving
concrete figures.
Migros' image, however, is as institutional as it is
multi-dimensional. Like no other brand, Migros stands for the development of Switzerland
into a modern consumer society, something company head Anton Scherrer recognises.
"The secret of the brand lies in the person of Gottlieb Duttweiler", he says.
Scherrer sees it as one of his chief responsibilities to continue that heritage, even if
Migros is determined to embark on a comprehensive image overhaul.
Duttweiler died in 1962, Bilanz says, when Scherrer
was just 20 years old. Yet the culture established by the founder still runs throughout
the company. A ban on sales of alcohol and tobacco still exists, for example, as does a
commitment to spend a certain percentage of turnover on cultural and social initiatives.
Its own-brand strategy, too, is core to Migros'
character. The policy of only stocking Migros-branded goods was originally introduced by
Duttweiler in protest at the pricing conditions imposed by major manufacturers. Despite
the fact that suppliers grew in strength over the years, Duttweiler stuck to his policy
and only recently has migros opened up its shelves again to the likes of Kellogg's and
Nestlé.
A successful own-label strategy has many advantages,
not least in that it helps traditional retailers to stand up to the growing number of
discount chains, Bilanz says. In Switzerland as in the UK, where Tesco has been so
successful, the market share enjoyed by discounters remains at less than 10%. In Germany,
on the other hand, where only 12% of grocery sales are of 'own label' products,
discounters account for 38% of the market. That's why the Swiss Coop is now placing
renewed emphasis on house brands such as Betty Bossi and Naturaplan, Bilanz says. And
while Coop has an own-label share of sales of 56% compared to Migros' 10%, the two stores
are growing ever more similar.
That also means that Migros and Coop are coming into
direct competition more frequently. Recent examples have included a high-profile clash in
the media over the respective quality of each others' fish fingers, Bilanz says. Then,
later the same month, the newspaper Blick, basing its story on research from IHA-GfK, ran
with the headline: "Official. Coop overtakes Migros", prompting a rebuttal from
the latter, which released its own sales figures to show that the claim was untrue.
Nevertheless, says Bilanz, Migros cannot ignore the
aggressive strategy of expansion currently in place at Coop, which has, for example, led
to its share of food sales to rise from 20% to 23% over the past 3 years, while Migros'
share has only risen by 0.2% to 24.4%. Then there's the price cutting drive of home-grown
discounters such as Denner and Pick Pay, as well as competition from foreign retailers
such as Carrefour, Aldi and Lidl. So far, Migros' reaction has been muted, Bilanz says,
and, rather than panic, the company plans to maintain its resistance in its own style.
Beat Mühlemann, who heads Migros' advertising activities, likens his task to that of a
hairdresser: "We want to give the stores a new style, without people noticing at once
that we've had our hair cut", he tells Bilanz.
Indeed, consumers will barely notice a difference in
the project's early stages. Logos and signatures will be gradually phased in by the 10
regional Migros operations between now and the year 2010, meaning also that the quoted
cost of 67 million Swiss francs will be spread over a number of years.
Thoe most visible change, Bilanz says, will be the
new uniforms sported by the staff, due to be introduced throughout the chain in spring
2005 and replacing clothing that currently varies by region.
Elsewhere, Migros has extended its 'M-Budget'
discount range from 160 to 200 articles and plans to double its revenues from the segment
during 2004. Then there's the introduction of brands such as Kelloggs, Red Bull and
Nivea, bringing additional income of SFr. 300 million. Migros still has to resolve the
proliferation of own brand names within its stores and is examining employing a simple,
signature scheme like the one introduced by Coop, Bilanz says.
Despite the redesign, Migros is unlikely to have a 'one-size-fits-all' appearance,
however. It's not what people want, says Bilanz, and in any case, they are much more
converned with what is on the shelves than how the packaging looks. |